Search: This Site | People | Departments | Penn State
Voting results point to a changing electorate
Political scientists and public policy experts at Penn State Harrisburg gathered on Nov. 7 to discuss the re-election of Barack Obama. Chief among the lessons learned from the election, they said, was that the face of the electorate in the United States is changing.
While polls reported a tightening race across the nation in the final days before the election, the contest came down to a few battleground states, according to the panelists. “It was a more targeted election than we’ve ever had in that there were only about nine states up for grabs,” said Jeremy Plant, professor of public policy. Obama created momentum by taking early contests including Ohio, Virginia, and Pennsylvania.
Obama’s ability to capture the vote of key groups proved pivotal to his victory. Obama took the youth vote, according to CNN exit polls garnering 60% of voters under 30, who made up a greater percentage of the electorate in 2012 than in 2008.
“In many of my town hall meetings and student meetings as an adjunct instructor, the old model was that young people have the power, but they didn’t vote,” said David Argall, instructor of political science and Pennsylvania state senator. “That’s not the case anymore.”
Obama also captured 55% of the female vote and 81% of the minority vote. “One of the most important lessons from this election is that we are a different country now,” said Plant. According to the Washington Post, the percentage of non-whites grew from 20 percent of the electorate in 2000 to 28 percent in 2012.
Mark Singel, instructor of political science and public policy, and former Pennsylvania Lieutenant Governor and Acting Governor, suggested that diplomacy prevailed after a heated race. “We have undergone a relatively peaceful selection process in the face of strong opinions from across the ideological spectrum,” he said.
Matthew Woessner, associate professor of political science and public policy, said it seemed half of his students came to class pleased, the other half sullen, the day after the race. That the system worked successfully proved the collective victory, Woessner said. Although he voiced disappointment that Mitt Romney was defeated in the general election, Woessner argued that “the great triumph [for America] is that the will of the people shall prevail.” “This is a time to revel in the joys of democracy,” he said.
Penn State Harrisburg News Archive
- May 2013 (9)
- April 2013 (26)
- March 2013 (15)
- February 2013 (21)
- January 2013 (12)
- December 2012 (9)
- November 2012 (15)
- October 2012 (15)
- September 2012 (11)
- August 2012 (12)
- July 2012 (8)
- June 2012 (7)
- May 2012 (14)
- April 2012 (16)
- March 2012 (22)
- February 2012 (16)
- January 2012 (7)
- December 2011 (3)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (12)
- September 2011 (11)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (8)
- May 2011 (16)
- April 2011 (16)
- March 2011 (21)
- February 2011 (18)
- January 2011 (13)
- December 2010 (9)
- November 2010 (10)
- October 2010 (17)
- September 2010 (7)
- August 2010 (7)
- July 2010 (7)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (15)
- April 2010 (19)
- March 2010 (24)
- February 2010 (8)
- January 2010 (23)
- December 2009 (11)
- November 2009 (11)
- October 2009 (25)
- September 2009 (16)
- August 2009 (11)
- July 2009 (13)
- June 2009 (17)
- May 2009 (16)
- April 2009 (19)
- March 2009 (28)
- February 2009 (23)
- January 2009 (12)
- December 2008 (8)
- November 2008 (15)
- October 2008 (18)
- September 2008 (15)
- August 2008 (16)
- July 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (10)
- May 2008 (15)
- April 2008 (25)
- March 2008 (20)
- February 2008 (14)
- January 2008 (20)
- December 2007 (10)
- November 2007 (18)
- October 2007 (22)
- September 2007 (8)
- August 2007 (12)
- July 2007 (9)
- June 2007 (11)
- May 2007 (10)
- April 2007 (21)
- March 2007 (25)
- February 2007 (14)
- January 2007 (21)
- November 2006 (3)
- May 2006 (2)
- November 2005 (4)
- May 2005 (1)
- May 2004 (1)


Subscribe